see on väga delikaatne teema.Kindlasti need ,kes eesti liigat on mänginud on igasugu asju näinud.Ja karta on ,et ka FC Soccernet saab kohtunike kahtlaste otsuste läbi puudutatud, sest reeglina võtab uutel vähemalt hooaja jagu aega ,et kohaneda vilepartiiga(eriti kui ollaxe teadlikud reeglitest jne)Aga UEFA pakub välja kriteeriume oma kohtunikele ,mis peax aitama ära määrata ,kas viga kastis on penaltit väärt või mitte,Siin nad on Uefa.com lehekyljelt artiklist "Mallorca penalty":
If you remember previously, the UEFA Referees Committee determined additional criteria to assist the referee in making such decisions when a player is denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity or a promising action is prevented. For a situation to be an obvious goalscoring opportunity, the following criteria should be considered:
a) the opportunity for the attacker to control and play the ball;
b) his position, ie. the direction towards the goal;
c) the distance from the incident to the goal line, ie. the probability of reaching the goal within the next few seconds; and
d) position of the defenders and their opportunity to stop the attacker legitimately.
Vähemalt saime siit teada, mis on "ilmne väravavõimalus"
If you remember previously, the UEFA Referees Committee determined additional criteria to assist the referee in making such decisions when a player is denied an obvious goalscoring opportunity or a promising action is prevented. For a situation to be an obvious goalscoring opportunity, the following criteria should be considered:
a) the opportunity for the attacker to control and play the ball;
b) his position, ie. the direction towards the goal;
c) the distance from the incident to the goal line, ie. the probability of reaching the goal within the next few seconds; and
d) position of the defenders and their opportunity to stop the attacker legitimately.
Vähemalt saime siit teada, mis on "ilmne väravavõimalus"
Kommentaar