Liverpool

[eston maravilha]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

liverpool siiski cl\'is järgmine aasta

[eston maravilha]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

esimene pilt paraadilt

[EgoTrip]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

super, super, super
kahju, et elumäng jäi otse nägemata. tv3 ikkagi sucks ass
üks asi mis mind häirima jäi. kui Didi tuli sisse, kas Liverpool ei jätkanud siiski 4 kaitsjaga?
Carragher - Hyypiä - Traore - Riise
mängust tundus, küll nii

igatahes jah, midagi pole öelda. hääl ära, tööl ei käidud, magada sai vähe.
aga tunne on hea

[Tauri.T]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Lisaajal mängis paremkaitses Gerrard. Ja mingi aja mängisid nad vist 3 kaitsjaga.

[telekavaataja]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Tegelikult sain teada, et on võimalik 6 minutit elumängu näidata ja siis 114 minutit lihtsalt seista väljakul ning ikka võitu saada. Õnnitlused kõigile, kes kuidagi Liverpooliga seotud. Järgmine aasta Cl-s siis Liverpooli me ei näe. Moraal on selles võistkonnas kõige tugevaim Euroopas.

[vaikiv mees]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Algselt postitas vello99

mulle tundus, et penaldi puhul võttis Gerrard snorkli ja lestad välja ja tegi oma töö hästi ära.

mitte ainult sulle,
kui Pasi Rautiaise tähelepanu oli juhitud samale asjale, et neutraalselt võttes penaltit justkui polnud seal, vastas ta ju külmalt, et Milan oligi vaja passiivsuse eest ära karistada

[reed]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Algselt postitas telekavaataja


Tegelikult sain teada, et on võimalik 6 minutit elumängu näidata ja siis 114 minutit lihtsalt seista väljakul ning ikka võitu saada. Õnnitlused kõigile, kes kuidagi Liverpooliga seotud. Järgmine aasta Cl-s siis Liverpooli me ei näe. Moraal on selles võistkonnas kõige tugevaim Euroopas.

see pole ju veel kirikus kuulutatud, et ei näe, see otsustatakse 16 juunil alles nii ,et sinnamaani kannatust sõbrad

[siimsorokin]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Algselt postitas Anfield

Algselt postitas eston maravilha


liverpool siiski cl\'is järgmine aasta

Väga hea uudis. Nüüd vähemalt kindel et saame ka järgmine hooaeg punaseid euroopas näha. Kaitseme tiitlit .

Vaata korra uuesti seda linki.

[RD]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

normaalne oleks kui liverpool saaks ikka, kusjuures walesi meister pakkus neile juba oma kohta eelringis

[skint]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Reds fan gatecrashes the party - Tuhanded fännid oleks vist sellise võimaluse eest valmis surema... Aga geniaalsus tuleb ikka kasuks.

Ahsoo, ma polegi vist veel öelnud, et oli tore finaal. Oli tore finaal.

[10 Lopez Saldana]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

ääägh, ma sain peaaegu kaineks, a õnneks suutsin muncheni lennujaamast veel pudeli mummi osta ja end kuni lennukini konditsioonis hoida. mängu ma ju ei pea kommenteerima. onjo?

[Martin]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Ma tunnen end nii McN\'ina.

THE TIMES!!!

Sorry, Liverpool. You can\'t bend rules for a side that has gone to Pot Noodle Viide
By Giles Smith
WIN the Eurovision Song Contest and you get to host the competition the year after. Win the European Cup and you aren’t even guaranteed a dressing-room next time. It’s one of the vital distinctions between these two great institutions of European life — institutions that, down the years, have grown to resemble one another in so many respects, not least their unreliability as cultural barometers. Or, to put it another way, if My Number One, by Helena Paparizou, really is the greatest song we’ll hear anywhere on the continent in 2005, it’s possible that Liverpool really are the best team in Europe right now.

The question of whether Uefa should lower the hurdle to gymkhana level and admit Liverpool to next season’s European Cup has hovered for several weeks but, since Wednesday, it’s been packed with added sentiment. David Moores, the Liverpool chairman, was biblical on the theme. “It would be absolutely diabolical if we weren’t allowed to defend it,” he said.

Richard Caborn, the Sports Minister, was offering the opinion that it would be “a travesty” if Liverpool were left out. And David Davies, the executive director of the FA, asserted that Liverpool should be given a place “for the wider interests of European football”, which is certainly an interesting way to talk about Jerzy Dudek.

“The whole world will want us to play now,” Rick Parry, the Liverpool chief executive, said on Thursday — conveniently ignoring the part of the whole world that supports Everton, and a number of other parts of the world, too, where the European Cup and its ideals and traditions are highly respected.

Somewhat more sinister are reports of the sponsors being egged to carry the fight to Uefa on Liverpool’s behalf. Even Liverpool supporters, surely — always keen to emphasise the club’s legendary roots and soulfulness — would be uncomfortable to think that their team was back in the cup simply because PlayStation had got heavy on their behalf.

Either way, here’s the situation. Not content with seizing the biggest prize in club football in an outcome that nobody in their right mind would have predicted at any point in the season — and certainly not at half-time on Wednesday night — Liverpool now appear to want another prize for winning it. To be still more specific about this, so that we can accurately gauge the scale of the presumption involved, they want another prize for winning it on penalties. Talk about pushing your luck.

Of course, given the overwhelming sentimental pressure, it’s tempting to throw up one’s hands and ask, “Why not?” The competition is already so diluted — to the point where sides finishing fourth in their league, and 30 points adrift of their national champions, have been known to get in — they might as well let Liverpool play. Hell, let them all in: Liverpool, Shakhtar Donetsk, Heerenveen, Didcot Town, the FA Vase winners — even Middlesbrough if necessary.

At the same time, some dim but still flickering notion of what the European Cup is intended to be, and to stand for, inclines one to think that there might be a principle worth battling for here. There are, after all, two good reasons why places in the competition are offered as rewards for league form and nothing else: first, because league form is the only reliable measure of a side’s worth; second, because if league form is the only criterion for entry, participating clubs cannot afford to concentrate on the Cup to the neglect of their domestic leagues.

For better or worse, Uefa is determined to market the tournament as the footballing equivalent of a plate of smoked salmon; and, unfortunately, by the only standard that Uefa applies (league form), this Liverpool side is Pot Noodle. They finished fifth. They weren’t just off the pace; they were 37 points off the pace. They lost to Crystal Palace. They’re not quite as good as Everton, who aren’t that good either.

What would Uefa in effect be saying by granting Liverpool a free ride? That this Liverpool side so bestrides the modern game that the rules must bend before them? That’s a lot to conclude from a 3-3 draw with AC Milan — not to take anything away from that glorious comeback. Who could have thought that a streak of luck could hold so long and so true? It truly was a sight and I don’t suppose we’ve seen anything like it since Wycombe Wanderers advanced to the semi-finals of the FA Cup.

That said, wouldn’t any neutral, once in a while, like to see a Premiership side in Europe profit by cutting a swath through the opposition, rather than grimly clinging on to snatch it at the last? It didn’t happen with Manchester United in 1999 and it certainly didn’t happen with Liverpool on Wednesday. It’s the story of English football, I guess: never the irresistible force, always the immoveable object.

Small wonder that the leading anthems of English football include We Shall Not Be Moved and the theme from The Great Escape. What English clubs have a tradition of specialising in are lung-busting acts of tunnelling, frequently by people who have gone to elaborate lengths to bury themselves in the first place. (Rafael Benítez’s heatstroked decision to start with Harry Kewell on Wednesday night, and leave out Dietmar Hamann, showed that he too can be pretty handy in a hole with a spade when he needs to be.)

Now, one can be as much a sucker for those stories of narrow and implausible escape — those Boy’s Own tales of chancing it — as the next person, without necessarily wanting to see them enshrined within the articles of the European Cup. The competition, after all, is not intended to be the Carling Cup with Air Miles; it’s intended to be the rarefied stage on which the best clubs in Europe peel off their evening gloves to go mano a mano. And if Uefa has a genuine will to keep the shell-suited riff-raff at bay, it probably ought to use Wednesday night’s slightly embarrassing outcome as an excuse to diminish the number of places available to each nation, rather than to increase it.

That, one concedes, may be beyond Uefa’s remit. But if the European Cup is to continue to mean anything — indeed, if the big sides are to continue to think of it as a club that they wish to belong to — then the law needs to be upheld, Liverpool need to be excluded, and the point needs to be firmly made that no one can seriously expect to blag a place merely by winning it. It’s going to involve a lot more work than that.

[skint]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

mcnamara küll kunagi midagi nii pikka ja ingliskeelset, mida keegi nkn kunagi lugeda ei viitsi, foorumisse ei kopi...

[Martin]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

Algselt postitas skint


mcnamara küll kunagi midagi nii pikka ja ingliskeelset, mida keegi nkn kunagi lugeda ei viitsi, foorumisse ei kopi...

Seetõttu ma olengi versiooni võrra parem

[eston maravilha]

Vastus teemale \'Liverpool\'

mina lugesin läbi ja õige jutt.. meistrite liigat päästab ainult üks asi - osaleda saavad ainult meistrid