Päevapoliitika

[vendetta]

Milline osa sul lausest endiste! kaevanduste osas kahe silma vahele jääb? Ülgase klindialad on umbes 20m merepinnast kõrgemal kui näiteks Pakri tuulepark keskmiselt. Ometi sinna pole eriti keegi tahtnud seni tuulikuid rajada kuigi Suur-Tallinn on eriti elektrimaias. Tuulte ''liikumisega'' olen kõvasti üle dumbuseri taseme kursis juba vähemalt 30 aastat ja sealt tekivad ka need õelad küsimused

[orbitaaljaam]

Sul hea võimalus energiaeksperdina tegeleda soccerneti ketseritega. Ma põhimõtteliselt ei ole tuulikute vastu. Aga suur küsimärk tekib planeeringute teostusega küll. Miks Kuldne Harjumaa praktiliselt välistatud? Kui Ämari ja Ülemiste lennukoridorid välja jätta, miks ei võiks olla tuulepargid endiste kaevanduste ja paepealsete vähese väärtusega põldude asemel just siin olla? Miks see hiigel-mere-tuulepark peaks just Liivi lahes või Saaremaa läänerannikul võrdlemisi puutumata loodusaladel olema, mitte näiteks Tallinna madala või muude intensiivselt laevatavate alade läheduses? Juba võrku ühendamise kulude peal säästaks miinimum sadu miljoneid ju.

Kaevandusse tuulepark?
Seal kogu point ei ole, et peaks nagu pigem lagedal pinnal olema või kõrgemal, mitte kuskil augus?

Ja see suht vandenõuteooria lvl postitus sul üldse. On üsna vähe tõenäoline, et keegi siit foorumist annab selgelt põhjendatud ja argumenteeritud vastuse eesti tuulteliikumistest/geoloogiast ja milline on kõige sobivam koht ja kus radaritele ette ei jää jälle. Ehk vähe usutav, et sa saad siht konkreetse vastuse, ja suht troll postitus ses vaates.

Disclaimer: elan Tallinna südalinnas ning kõrghooned kuuluvad igapäevase silmapiiri juurde. 1000 tuulikut ei muudaks Harku Järve peal mu elu kuidagi. Või Tallinna lahes. Ülemiste järve peale eelistaks neid mitte. Ma joon kraanivett, et see võiks veits vett äkki rikkuda kui järv tuulikuid täis ehitada.

[vendetta]

See kole professionaalne trollimine saab valimiste eel olema äärmiselt ebameeldiv - kõigepealt Nursipalu, siis need Tuulikud, Tuumajaam*, Pelguranna tramm (lol). Kuulasin just enne Olukorrast Riigis ka ja saab ikka väga raske olema, kuidas kõik asjapulgad suudaks selle seltskonna suu kinni panna, me oleme selle tiba käest ära lasknud.

Palun tegelege oma vanemate ja eakamate sugulastega, et nad suudaks end sellest informatsioonist läbi närida.

Sul hea võimalus energiaeksperdina tegeleda soccerneti ketseritega. Ma põhimõtteliselt ei ole tuulikute vastu. Aga suur küsimärk tekib planeeringute teostusega küll. Miks Kuldne Harjumaa praktiliselt välistatud? Kui Ämari ja Ülemiste lennukoridorid välja jätta, miks ei võiks olla tuulepargid endiste kaevanduste ja paepealsete vähese väärtusega põldude asemel just siin olla? Miks see hiigel-mere-tuulepark peaks just Liivi lahes või Saaremaa läänerannikul võrdlemisi puutumata loodusaladel olema, mitte näiteks Tallinna madala või muude intensiivselt laevatavate alade läheduses? Juba võrku ühendamise kulude peal säästaks miinimum sadu miljoneid ju.

[Wingback]

https://www.postimees.ee/8182964/youtube-sulges-ekre-uudisteportaali-kanali

[JuriM]

See kole professionaalne trollimine saab valimiste eel olema äärmiselt ebameeldiv - kõigepealt Nursipalu, siis need Tuulikud, Tuumajaam*, Pelguranna tramm (lol). Kuulasin just enne Olukorrast Riigis ka ja saab ikka väga raske olema, kuidas kõik asjapulgad suudaks selle seltskonna suu kinni panna, me oleme selle tiba käest ära lasknud.

Palun tegelege oma vanemate ja eakamate sugulastega, et nad suudaks end sellest informatsioonist läbi närida.

[boobek]

Lühike kirjatükk selgitab miks kõik EL -is p****s on:

European Leaders Double Down on Stagnation at Davos

Many market participants appeared astonished to learn that Von Der Leyen and Scholz in Davos were steadfastly pursuing the policies that have severely damaged the EU. However, this is typical bureaucratic behaviour.

In a predictable move, EU bureaucrats have chosen to exploit the new Trump administration as an external enemy, rather than seizing the opportunity to unleash the immense potential of their economies. Bureaucrats do not care about results; they care about bureaucracy.
Ursula Von Der Leyen expressed her unwavering commitment to upholding the European Union’s climate and economic strategies when she asserted that “Europe will continue on its current path,” a stance marked by stagnation, high taxes, low competitiveness, and excessive debt. The Paris Agreement continues to be the best hope of all humanity,” she repeated. “Europe will stay the course and keep working with all nations that want to protect nature and stop global warming.” This statement is simply incorrect. The EU has used the Paris Climate Agreement as a tool for economic and social control, causing harm to its industrial and business infrastructure. In fact, the Paris Climate Agreement has achieved the opposite of its intended goals. The EU is now more dependent on imports of liquefied natural gas and coal to address supply challenges. European Union climate policies have only reduced emissions by crippling economic growth and industrial production.

Technology, competition, and free markets are necessary for environmental defence, not interventionism.

We should not be surprised when we read that the European Commission will present its competitive compass plan without reducing government overspending or eliminating any of the taxation and legislation burdens that have crippled the European Union.

Over the past 16 years, the U.S. GDP has grown by 94%, while the European Union’s nominal GDP has only increased by 11.2%. This has happened in a period of enormous fiscal and monetary “stimulus packages,” including the Juncker Plan and the Next Generation EU Fund, as well as negative nominal rates. The European Union stagnation is a consequence of a chain of public sector-promoted spending programs that have left a trail of debt and no real productivity growth.
From 2010 to 2023, productivity in the EU increased by only 5%, significantly lower than the 22% increase in the U.S. during the same period. How can this happen?

When governments subsidise low productivity and penalise high productivity with enormous taxes, the economy slumps.

European Union officials justify this trend, citing the rise of China and emerging economies as the reasons for the European relative decline. However, the share of global GDP for the EU has decreased from 34% in 1960 to 15% in 2024, while the U.S. has seen an increase from 25% to 28% over the same timeframe.

Social indicators are also significantly poorer. The unemployment rate in the European Union was 5.9% in November 2024. In the same period, the unemployment rate in the United States was recorded at 4.2%. However, countries like Spain and Greece have unemployment rates of 11.2% and 9.6%, respectively, with the population at risk of poverty and exclusion at 27% in Spain, 25% in Greece, and an average of 21% in the EU, according to Eurostat, with 13% of the population living in poverty. In the United States, the equivalent to the European rate is 22%, with 11% of the population living in poverty.

The EU’s at-risk-of-poverty threshold for a single person in Germany, the richest nation, stood at $14,124 per year. In Spain, it stood at $10,393 according to INE. In the US, it was $14,580 according to official figures. This means the poor in the United States are richer and fewer than in Europe.

The sad truth is that the alleged social contract and enormous government spending have not helped Europe in any area, and the average tax wedge is ten points higher in the EU than in the US, according to the Tax Foundation.

In Europe, it’s quite common to blame its economic weakness on a lack of central bank support. It is simply false. The increase in money supply (M2) in the Euro Area from 2020 to 2025 was around 15%, and the balance sheet of the ECB is significantly larger than the United States Federal Reserve. The ECB’s balance sheet stands at 42% of GDP after reaching a peak of 69%, while the Fed’s balance sheet is 24.4% of GDP after reaching a peak of 37%. Furthermore, the European Central Bank (ECB) implemented negative nominal interest rates on June 11, 2014, and has kept its anti-fragmentation and liquidity tools intact.

The ECB has been characterised by a hugely accommodative policy, focusing on maintaining price stability with a target inflation rate of “below, but close to, 2% over the medium term.”

The European Union is the poster boy of neo-Keynesianism and is losing in every social and economic area, missing all its opportunities in energy, technology, and industry. Bureaucracy, high taxes, and misguided interventionist policies.

The European Union could thrive with lower government spending, tax cuts, and eliminating bureaucracy because it has the human capital, businesses, and entrepreneurs to achieve it. However, the EU leaders do not want to reduce interventionism and their economic control objectives, leading to a significant risk of the EU bowing to China instead of cooperating with the US.

The EU problem is not Trump; it is the European Union’s interventionist political agenda.

Link: https://www.dlacalle.com/en/european...tion-at-davos/

[Wingback]

Eesti tuumajaama teema on aktiivsemalt tagasi pildis:

https://www.delfi.ee/artikkel/120352588/valitsus-tutvustas-energeetikaplaani-tuumajaam-ja-suured-toetused-tuuleparkidele

[kaala]

seoses AI'ga jäi silma selline lõik:

"We were able to meet with senior staff. So we met with very senior people in the White House, in the inner core.
We basically relayed our concerns about A.I., and their response to us was, “Yes, the national agenda on A.I. We will implement it in the Biden administration and in the second term. We are going to make sure that A.I. is going to be a function of two or three large companies. We will directly regulate and control those companies. There will be no start-ups. This whole thing where you guys think you can just start companies and write code and release code on the internet — those days are over. That’s not happening.”
We were shocked that it was even worse than we thought. We said, “Well, that seems really radical.” We said, “Honestly, we don’t understand how you’re going to control and ban open-source A.I., because it’s just math and code on the internet. How are you possibly going to control it?” And the response was, “We classified entire areas of physics during the Cold War. If we need to do that for math or A.I. going forward, we’ll do that, too.”

https://archive.md/CmqUp

[LeeRomeno]

uudises jäi silma selline asi:
as well as computer generated/artificial intelligence child pornography

võibolla on isegi lootust, et tulevikus pedofiilid ühiskonnal enam nii palju kahju ei tee?

haige muidugi mõelda, et see sisu saab ju tulla ainult olemasoleval materjalil põhineva "õppimise" toel.

[lenc]

No Ai'ga lood endale sobiva "fantaasia" ja siis lähed irl seda taaslavastama.. Kahjuks nii see käib.

Umbes nii nagu kõik need kes käivad kinos Tarantino filme vaatamas hakkavad kohe mõrvariteks ja mafioosodeks?

[JuriM]

uudises jäi silma selline asi:
as well as computer generated/artificial intelligence child pornography

võibolla on isegi lootust, et tulevikus pedofiilid ühiskonnal enam nii palju kahju ei tee?

No Ai'ga lood endale sobiva "fantaasia" ja siis lähed irl seda taaslavastama.. Kahjuks nii see käib.

[$$$]

uudises jäi silma selline asi:
as well as computer generated/artificial intelligence child pornography

võibolla on isegi lootust, et tulevikus pedofiilid ühiskonnal enam nii palju kahju ei tee?

[boobek]

Kuidas algab:

darrin_bell_darrin_bell_for_04132023_5_.gif

Kuidas lõpeb:

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/cartoonist-arrested-child-porn/3762634/

[vendetta]

rumal küsimus... aga kas meie pool umbes samamoodi ca 2x eelarve ja ajakavagaga mööda ei pannud? (vb mul on mingi fake news kuskilt meelde jäänd)

Oleks vaid 2x eelarvega puusse pandud, siis võiks neid rail baldicuid kohe mitu tükki võtta varuks.

[boobek]

Puhkus:

https://x.com/AFpost/status/1872684916569505843